Bluetti AC70 vs EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
Mid-size (500–1,500Wh) · spec-by-spec, winner marked per row
Verdict
The Bluetti AC70 and the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro are after the same buyer, so this one is decided in the details.
What the Bluetti AC70 brings: 2,000W output vs 1,600W, a much faster AC recharge and 500W solar input vs 220W.
The case for the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro: a 2.4 kg weight saving.
Bottom line: the Bluetti AC70 makes sense if you care about 2,000W output vs 1,600W and a much faster AC recharge, while the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro wins on a 2.4 kg weight saving.
Side-by-side specifications
✓ marks the better number in each row (Bluetti AC70: 5 wins · EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro: 2 wins — but weigh the rows that matter for your use, not the count).
| Bluetti AC70 | EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 768 Wh | 768 Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Cycle life (to 80%) | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| AC output (continuous) | 1,000 W ✓ | 800 W |
| AC output (surge) | 2,000 W ✓ | 1,600 W |
| 240V output | No | No |
| Max solar input | 500 W ✓ | 220 W |
| Solar voltage window | 12-58V | 11-50V |
| Max USB-C power | 100 W | 100 W |
| AC recharge 0–80% | 45 min ✓ | 70 min |
| UPS switchover | 20 ms ✓ | 30 ms |
| Expandable | No | No |
| Weight | 10.2 kg | 7.8 kg ✓ |
| Energy density | 75 Wh/kg | 98 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Launch price | $599 | $599 |
| Value (launch $/Wh) | $0.78 | $0.78 |
Dig deeper
Related comparisons
Other matchups involving these models, and units in the same size class.
768Wh vs 716Wh
1,056Wh vs 1,152Wh
1,056Wh vs 1,070Wh
1,024Wh vs 1,056Wh
1,024Wh vs 1,024Wh
1,024Wh vs 1,056Wh