Bluetti EB3A vs Anker SOLIX C300
Small (under 500Wh) · spec-by-spec, winner marked per row
Verdict
On paper these two overlap almost completely. The differences that matter take some digging, so we did the digging.
In the Bluetti EB3A's corner: 1,200W output vs 300W, a much faster AC recharge and 200W solar input vs 100W.
Our take: the Bluetti EB3A makes sense if you care about 1,200W output vs 300W and a much faster AC recharge.
Side-by-side specifications
✓ marks the better number in each row (Bluetti EB3A: 4 wins · Anker SOLIX C300: 6 wins — but weigh the rows that matter for your use, not the count).
| Bluetti EB3A | Anker SOLIX C300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 268 Wh | 288 Wh ✓ |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Cycle life (to 80%) | 2,500 | 3,000 ✓ |
| AC output (continuous) | 600 W ✓ | 300 W |
| AC output (surge) | 1,200 W ✓ | 600 W |
| 240V output | No | No |
| Max solar input | 200 W ✓ | 100 W |
| Solar voltage window | 12-28V | 11-32V |
| Max USB-C power | 100 W | 140 W ✓ |
| AC recharge 0–80% | 30 min ✓ | 50 min |
| UPS switchover | 20 ms | 20 ms |
| Expandable | No | No |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 4.2 kg ✓ |
| Energy density | 58 Wh/kg | 69 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Launch price | $299 | $299 |
| Value (launch $/Wh) | $1.12 | $1.04 ✓ |